diff options
author | Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org> | 2022-07-31 14:19:03 +0200 |
---|---|---|
committer | Jay Berkenbilt <ejb@ql.org> | 2022-07-31 14:21:53 +0200 |
commit | c9cc8cfd74fdb59d5450939e1772dea35d369b04 (patch) | |
tree | 4c049a59e612437635b80d31d4db9bc0ac40d9bb /libtests/predictors.cc | |
parent | 4674c04cb80e0a50cde1b97464642e2778f9522f (diff) | |
download | qpdf-c9cc8cfd74fdb59d5450939e1772dea35d369b04.tar.zst |
Remove lgtm banner
Over time, qpdf's grade has dropped on lgtm, but they are not
transparent about how grades are assigned. Fixing current alerts, in
my opinion, reduces clarity and maintainability of the code in the
name of performance in non-critical sections of code. Some analysis by
m-holger suggests that fixing some of the current alerts actually
degrades performance (slightly) while fixing others results in
insignificant improvements. The quality of qpdf can be measured in
other ways, such as its extensive test suite, documentation, and long
track record of reliably manipulating PDFs with high performance, few
bugs, and few external dependencies. The lgtm rating is a distraction
at best.
Diffstat (limited to 'libtests/predictors.cc')
0 files changed, 0 insertions, 0 deletions