From 582b500cd996c96054615870fd13d6ab0ea77428 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jay Berkenbilt
+This document describes the differences in the ways that PCRE and Perl handle
+regular expressions. The differences described here are with respect to Perl
+5.8.
+
+1. PCRE does not have full UTF-8 support. Details of what it does have are
+given in the
+section on UTF-8 support
+in the main
+pcre
+page.
+
+2. PCRE does not allow repeat quantifiers on lookahead assertions. Perl permits
+them, but they do not mean what you might think. For example, (?!a){3} does
+not assert that the next three characters are not "a". It just asserts that the
+next character is not "a" three times.
+
+3. Capturing subpatterns that occur inside negative lookahead assertions are
+counted, but their entries in the offsets vector are never set. Perl sets its
+numerical variables from any such patterns that are matched before the
+assertion fails to match something (thereby succeeding), but only if the
+negative lookahead assertion contains just one branch.
+
+4. Though binary zero characters are supported in the subject string, they are
+not allowed in a pattern string because it is passed as a normal C string,
+terminated by zero. The escape sequence "\0" can be used in the pattern to
+represent a binary zero.
+
+5. The following Perl escape sequences are not supported: \l, \u, \L,
+\U, \P, \p, \N, and \X. In fact these are implemented by Perl's general
+string-handling and are not part of its pattern matching engine. If any of
+these are encountered by PCRE, an error is generated.
+
+6. PCRE does support the \Q...\E escape for quoting substrings. Characters in
+between are treated as literals. This is slightly different from Perl in that $
+and @ are also handled as literals inside the quotes. In Perl, they cause
+variable interpolation (but of course PCRE does not have variables). Note the
+following examples:
+
+
+
+
DIFFERENCES FROM PERL
+
+ Pattern PCRE matches Perl matches
+
+
+
+ \Qabc$xyz\E abc$xyz abc followed by the + contents of $xyz + \Qabc\$xyz\E abc\$xyz abc\$xyz + \Qabc\E\$\Qxyz\E abc$xyz abc$xyz ++ +
+The \Q...\E sequence is recognized both inside and outside character classes. +
++7. Fairly obviously, PCRE does not support the (?{code}) and (?p{code}) +constructions. However, there is some experimental support for recursive +patterns using the non-Perl items (?R), (?number) and (?P>name). Also, the PCRE +"callout" feature allows an external function to be called during pattern +matching. +
++8. There are some differences that are concerned with the settings of captured +strings when part of a pattern is repeated. For example, matching "aba" against +the pattern /^(a(b)?)+$/ in Perl leaves $2 unset, but in PCRE it is set to "b". +
++9. PCRE provides some extensions to the Perl regular expression facilities: +
++(a) Although lookbehind assertions must match fixed length strings, each +alternative branch of a lookbehind assertion can match a different length of +string. Perl requires them all to have the same length. +
++(b) If PCRE_DOLLAR_ENDONLY is set and PCRE_MULTILINE is not set, the $ +meta-character matches only at the very end of the string. +
++© If PCRE_EXTRA is set, a backslash followed by a letter with no special +meaning is faulted. +
++(d) If PCRE_UNGREEDY is set, the greediness of the repetition quantifiers is +inverted, that is, by default they are not greedy, but if followed by a +question mark they are. +
++(e) PCRE_ANCHORED can be used to force a pattern to be tried only at the first +matching position in the subject string. +
++(f) The PCRE_NOTBOL, PCRE_NOTEOL, PCRE_NOTEMPTY, and PCRE_NO_AUTO_CAPTURE +options for pcre_exec() have no Perl equivalents. +
++(g) The (?R), (?number), and (?P>name) constructs allows for recursive pattern +matching (Perl can do this using the (?p{code}) construct, which PCRE cannot +support.) +
++(h) PCRE supports named capturing substrings, using the Python syntax. +
++(i) PCRE supports the possessive quantifier "++" syntax, taken from Sun's Java +package. +
++(j) The (R) condition, for testing recursion, is a PCRE extension. +
++(k) The callout facility is PCRE-specific. +
+
+Last updated: 09 December 2003
+
+Copyright © 1997-2003 University of Cambridge.
--
cgit v1.2.3-70-g09d2